|
Gary Zukov who wrote THE
MIND OF THE SOUL: Responsible Choice says it best:
"Karma is neither
good nor bad. Karma is the experience of what you have created.
It is the compassionate dynamic through which you learn to create
responsibly. Karma is the law of cause and effect through which you shape
your life with every decision. There are no good effects or bad effects.
There are only effects. You choose the cause, and that choice is also the
choice of an effect. The cause and the effect are one. Neither can exist
without the other. If you participate in the cause, you will always
participate in its effect, also. There are no exceptions.
You feel that the Universe is treating you badly, but it is not. It is
treating you the way you have asked it to treat you. You tell the Universe
how to treat you when you make choices. When you create suffering, you
experience suffering. When you create joy, you experience joy. Sooner or
later, you will make the connection between what you choose and what you
experience. Then you will choose differently.
Karma draws your attention to what you have created. Is your attention
not captured when you are in pain? Asking why the Universe is treating you
badly when you experience painful circumstances in your life is like
asking a mirror why you look the way that you do. Your reflection will not
change until you change. Karma is your reflection. You can throw away the
mirror, but your reflection will not change. You can blame the Universe
for your pain, but your pain will continue. Only you can change that, and,
eventually, you will."
"Karma and
Reincarnation - The key to Spiritual Evolution & Enlightenment"
by Dr.
Hiroshi Motoyama
Excerpted
from the Chapter on "Marital Karma: Varieties of Bonding"
"The
sexual bonding of two individuals who commit to each other as a couple,
usually in the form of marriage, is the prerequisite to birth and
therefore the foundation of family karma. Generally, it can occur in five
different ways:
| 1 |
Two beings
are linked together by the knots of their previous karmic
relationship, whether these knots be caused by attachment to
their mutual happiness or to their mutual suffering. |
| 2 |
Two beings
unite in the higher level of their individual spirits, in the
causal dimension, a level which always remains in an immaculate
condition. |
| 3 |
A unified
entity in a relatively high (divine) spiritual dimension splits
in two, manifests as a man and a woman on this earth, and the
two marry. |
| 4 |
Two beings
are temporarily bound together by materialistic, physical
passion. |
| 5 |
Two beings
of deep religious faith are united through the intercession of a
Higher Power. |
The
fundamental principle of 'self-attachment' has two basic aspects. The
first of these is that the 'self' begins to believe that it is all that
exists of its being. The second aspect is that the 'self' believes it is
unique and creates the distinction 'that others are different from self''.
This is the state of consciousness that most ordinary human beings
function within, and is the level upon which the most common type of
marital bonding occurs.
As soon
as individuals begin to function from the position of 'self', karma is
produced. Good and evil, happiness and unhappiness, and a myriad of other
distinctions are born. Each of these distinctions is created by the
'self', a 'self' that stumbles blindly onwards, completely unaware of the
increasing amount of karma that it is accumulating. The 'self' mistakenly
believes that it is acting freely under its own volition, ignorant that
the law of cause and effect is ceaselessly working through it.
Consciousness, entrapped by the 'self'', is unable to attain
self-awakening."
Please contact the
CIHS Book Store, where you may order books by Dr. Motoyama. Please Call,
fax or send an email to CIHS:
California
Institute for Human Science
701Garden View Ct.
Encinitas, CA 92024
USA
Phone: 760-634-1771
Fax: 760-634-1772
Email: admin@cihs.edu
the
Wanderling PRESENTS

THE TRUTH OF KARMA
From a series of lectures delivered at The China
Institute in America
New York, New York 1976
The concept of Karma plays a very important role
throughout Asia. Asian religions in general have established the famous
universal moral code based upon this law, that good deeds produce good
effects and bad deeds produce bad effects. However, it should be
pointed out that Buddhism places additional qualifications on this code:
I. The Good or Bad Effect Is Neither
Reward Nor Punishment
The so-called good effect or bad effect is not a judgment nor is it
given as a reward or punishment by a supramundane authority such as God.
The good or bad effect produced by good or bad Karma is purely and
simply a natural phenomenon governed by natural laws that act
automatically, with complete justice. If God has anything to do with it,
then God must also act according to this natural law. This cause
produces this effect. That cause produces that effect. God would not
change this natural path because of his like or dislike of a particular
person.
II. Good and Bad Are Not Defined By A
Human Code of Law.
The good and bad referred to here are not defined by any code or law
created by human being unless such a code or law follows the natural
path. For example, when democracy was first established in the United
States, women did not have the right to vote. At that time, women who
complied with that status were considered good and those who fought
against it were considered bad. The judgement was incorrect, however.
The natural path is that human beings are all equal, and thus the system
which gives women equal voting rights with men is truly the just one.
Therefore, those who opposed the unequal voting system were actually the
good ones.
This law of Karma, or cause and effect, is so
powerful that it governs everything in the universe except, according to
Buddhism, the one who is Enlightened or who recognizes basic nature. Upon
Enlightenment, the round of cause and effect loses its significance,
just as Samsara, or the round of birth and death, ceases with
Enlightenment. Since basic nature transcends all duality and is
ultimate, there is no one to receive the effect, whether it is good or
bad, and no one to whom any effect can apply. This unique explanation by
Buddha of the nullification of the law of Karma is very
important. I will discuss it below.
With this brief explanation of Karma as a background,
let us now go a step further to see how Karma works.
In one of the Buddhist texts it is recorded that
someone asked Buddha:
Why are some women ugly but rich?
Why are some women beautiful but poor?
Why are some people poor but with good health and a
long life?
Why are some rich yet ill and short-lived?
The Buddha 's answers
were:
One who is ugly but rich was short-tempered in past
lives easily irritated and angered but was also very generous and gave
offerings to the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha and made contributions to
many sentient beings.
One who is beautiful but poor was, in past lives,
very kind, always smiling and soft spoken, but was stingy and
reluctant to make offerings or help other people.
The person who is poor but in good health and
enjoying a long life was, in his or her past lives, very stingy or
reluctant to make donations, but was kind to all sentient beings, did
not harm or kill others, and also saved many sentient beings lives.
The person who is rich but often ill, or who is
short-lived, was, in his or her past lives, very generous in helping
others but loved hunting and killing and caused sentient beings to
feel worried, insecure, and frightened.
The above examples give us some idea of why people on
earth, although all human beings, vary so much in appearance, character,
lifespan, health, mental ability and fate. It is even more interesting
to note how much the circumstances in which a person is born can
influence his or her destiny. Which race, which nation, which skin
color, which era all these factors make a great difference. Would it not
be more logical to think that something was going on before one 's
birth that caused all those
effects than to say that it is purely accidental or even to say that it
is God's will?
If a baby has no past life, then on what grounds does God judge whether
to reward or to punish that baby by causing him or her to be born under
different circumstances? Intent, thought and action should always be
taken into consideration. Remember:
IT CANNOT COME TO PASS THAT THE FRUIT OF A DEED WELL
DONE BY BODY, SPEECH, AND THOUGHT SHOULD HAVE FOR A RESULT THAT WHICH IS
UNPLEASANT, HATEFUL OR DISTASTEFUL. BUT THAT IT SHOULD BE OTHERWISE IS
QUITE POSSIBLE.
"Karmic effect is the incomprehensible!" This
statement of Buddha suggests not only the complexity of karmic effects but
also the difficulty of predicting when a karmic effect will mature.
Generally speaking, however, Karma is like the action
of lighting a candle. The candle will light the whole room immediately and
will last until it is consumed. Similarly, Karma has the following
characteristics:
- Karma not only affects the doer but also affects others. The
magnitude of the Karma determines the sphere of its effect.
- Most Karma produces an immediate effect which will last until it is
consumed. The nature and magnitude of a karmic action determine the
duration of the effect, which may remain many years, or may not even
be felt until some other karmic conditions mature.
- Karmic effects can combine and accumulate.
These three points are rather condensed. I do not have
time to give you a detailed description of them. The following examples
however, might help you to understand these points a bit more:
- The discovery of electricity by Benjamin Franklin and the conversion
of electricity into light by Thomas Edison changed the lives of human
beings tremendously, and the effect is still growing.
- An action taken by the U.S. Congress to change the tax law will
immediately affect millions of American pockets. The effect can be
seen by many Americans in their lifetime, and it will also be felt by
future generations of Americans.
- The combined and cumulative karma of the system of slavery used by
many Americans over a long period of time has produced effects which
constitute a major domestic problem in the U.S.
- The theoretical discovery of atomic energy by Albert Einstein and
the joint effort of all the participants in the Manhattan Project
produced such complicated effects, good and bad, that we are probably
just beginning to realize the significance of these developments.
III. A comparison can be made of the
magnitude of effects of various kinds of Karma.
Such comparisons are recorded in many Buddhist
scriptures. I would like to give you some examples to enable you to form
your own ideas on how you may create karmic effects of greater
magnitude.
- One day, while walking on the street, Buddha met a beggar who was
a so-called untouchable in the strict caste society of India during
his time. Not only was Buddha friendly with him, but he accepted the
beggar as a disciple in his order of the Sangha. This action had an
effect which was infinitely greater than the acceptance of a prince
as his disciple.
- When the monk Bodhidharma went from India to China
he was welcomed by the Emperor Liang. The emperor asked him,
"What merit have I gained since I built so many temples,
erected so many pagodas, made so many offerings to Buddha, Dharma,
and Sangha, and did numerous other virtuous deed?" Bodhidharma
's
reply greatly
disappointed Emperor Liang. Bodhidharma said, "Your Majesty,
there is none. You have gained no merit. What you have done produces
only worldly rewards, that is, good fortune, great power, or great
wealth in your future lives, but you will still be wandering around in
Samsara."
Buddha often emphasized that to study and explain to others even a
few sentences of the teachings that show how to be rid of samsara
creates infinitely greater merit than making tremendous offerings to
as many Buddhas all over the universe as there are grains of sand in
the great Ganges River.
Buddha also taught these principles:
- One who makes numerous offerings to the Buddha, Dharma, and
Sangha, helps sentient being, and does many good deeds, and yet
dedicates all the merit accumulated thereby to one
's
own or one's
relatives interest such
as making more money or enjoying a longer or better present or
future life produces limited effects.
One who does those same good deeds but dedicates all the merit
to saving sentient beings from suffering in Samsara receives much
greater merit than the one with selfish purposes.
Finally, one who does the same good deeds with no specific
purpose or desire at all receives infinitely greater merit than
the two cases mentioned above.
IV. Karma and free will.
This topic has been discussed often. The question is:
"Is there any room for free will under the law of Karma?" A
more penetrating question is: "Might not free will be simply
subjective opinion? So-called free will is also an effect of
Karma."
For the most part Hindu and
Indian-based religious schools of thought, especially early ones,
believed in and promoted the concept that Karma operates in a straight
line, with actions from the past influencing the present, and present
actions influencing the future. As a result, they saw little room for
free will. A lot of that interpretation has permeated into western
culture and thought, with Karma ending up being an unbending
"fate" or "destiny" type of concept. However,
Karma operates more closely with the Buddhist view as formulated by
the Buddha, acting more or less in feedback loops, with the present
moment being shaped both by past and by present actions; present
actions shape not only the future but also the present. This
constant opening for present input into the causal process makes free
will possible. This freedom is symbolized in the imagery that
Buddhists use to explain the process: flowing water:
Sometimes
the flow from the past is so strong that little can be done except
to stand fast, but there are also times when the flow can be
diverted in almost any direction.
We could find many examples, all of which seem to
indicate that there is no room for free will under the law of Karma. Does
this mean the fate of a person is predetermined by his or her past Karma,
that a person has no way to change it? As seen above in the Buddhist view
of Karma this is not the case. Why and how, then, can one change one 's
fate?
Consider, for example, the work
by Dogen Zenji, "Hotsu Bodaishin," in the
twelve-fascicle edition, where he emphasizes the "arising of the 'Bodhi-mind'
(bodaishin), which entails the vow to save all others before
oneself" (ji mitokudo sendota). If causality is nothing other than
"if 'a' then necessarily 'b'," then "Hotsu Bodaishin"
becomes nonsensical, since no other causal agency other than the Self
can then have anything to do with salvation. This would clearly imply a
kind of personal atomic causality where the Self is isolated from all
"external" influences--precisely the kind of position that
Dogen is anxious to avoid.
We must remember that positive
acts also produce positive Karma, and positive Karma interacts with
negative Karma. In Dogen's "Kuyo Shobutsu," in the
twelve-fascicle edition, we read that "There is great fruit from
small causes, and great benefit from small acts." The implication
here is that soteriological Karma is more powerful than negative Karma.
In "Sanji-go," in the twelve-fascicle edition, we read a story
from the Abhidharma-mahaavibhaasaa-`saastra (sec. 69) that tells of a
good man (throughout this life), who, upon dying, finds that he is to be
reborn in a hell. At first he is resentful, believing himself destined
for a heavenly rebirth. But he then realizes that the hellish rebirth
was for evil that he had done in a previous life. This realization
(wisdom) changed his Karma such that he was in fact reborn in a heavenly
realm.
These passages show that Dogen by
no means had a simplistic and deterministic view of Karma. For Dogen,
Karma is not a static, substantial, linear series of causes and effects.
There is always the possibility of change, especially through the
attainment of wisdom. Thus Dogen, without denying the causal structure
of life and practice, rejects a rigid interpretation of Karma in favor
of a fluid, Karmic, interdependent universe that depends upon our
actions and understanding as part of its causal structure.
To help you to understand that one 's
fate is not entirely
predetermined by one's past
Karma, I must ask you to recall what I said before about our basic nature:
Cause and effect, just like
birth and death, lose their significance at the Enlightened level
because at the level of basic nature there is no one to receive the
effect of Karma, whether it is good or bad. Therefore, at the
extreme, when one is Enlightened, the law of Karma is not applicable.
All that the Enlightened one does, says, or thinks is through free will,
a manifestation of basic nature, and not the effect of past Karma.
All of Buddha 's teachings
aim at this one goal: that is, to identify oneself with one's
basic nature. All his
methods are designed to enable one to gradually come into harmony with
that basic nature.
Now, basic nature possesses all kinds of good human
qualities, such as loving-kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity.
All these good qualities could cause good Karma, which produces good
effects. Therefore, during the process of cultivating harmony with
basic nature, these good qualities will be revealed bit by bit, like
an occasional ray of sunshine penetrating through a heavy cloud. These
revelations are the true products of a person 's free
will. Because such free will creates good Karma, and because good Karma
produces good effects which in turn are good Karma for the next effect,
and so on, a person has the potential to become Enlightened, to
recognize basic nature, and to become a Buddha.
One will thus not only be rid of Samsara, but will
also gain the perfect wisdom and compassion necessary to teach other
sentient beings to follow the same path.
Karma is such a vast subject that I could talk for hours without
exhausting the material. Topics like the following could be very
interesting:
- Can good Karma and bad Karma offset each other?
- Can Karma be erased?
- Can the effects of bad Karma be minimized by confession or other
kind of repentance?
With the general idea of Karma I have presented to you
today, you may be able to find the answers to those questions.
In conclusion, I wish to emphasize two points:
1) Good or bad Karma will inevitably produce its
respective effect. Our daily doings, speech, and thoughts will affect
our future. A wise person knows, therefore, how to live properly.
2) Remember that the law of Karma stops operating and
you become rid of Samsara only by identifying yourself with your basic
nature. How you may gradually identify yourself with basic nature, and
realize that it is yourself, is the essence of Buddha 's
teaching. I sincerely
recommend that you study and practice it.
Among all the hindrances to our cultivation of
Enlightenment, the greatest obstacle is our concept of Self. This is
the core of all our ignorance and suffering. THIS
BEING PRESENT, THAT ARISES; WITHOUT THIS, THAT DOES NOT OCCUR.
|